|

Triple Field Meter:
Three Fields Detected 1) AC gaussmeter,
2) Electric field meter, 3) RF
field strength meter combined in one electromagnetic instrument.
This Triple Field Meter
is the only one which combines magnetic, electric, and radio/microwave
detectors in one package, so that the entire nonionizing electromagnetic
spectrum is covered. In addition, the magnetic setting and the
electric setting measure true magnitude, a feature found elsewhere only
in more expensive meters.
The Triple Field Meter Meter and
can be used to determine whether an AC line is hot or neutral, even
through a wall. It can easily detect by proximity which side of a wall
outlet or which wire of an extension cord is hot. It can also detect
improper grounding, as well as the extensive electric fields from video
monitors and fluorescent lights.
1) MAGNETIC FIELD DETECTION
In most homes or offices, some areas are
"hot" spots with readings in the HIGH range. Most often, this is caused
by magnetic fields, which come largely from unpaired internal wiring.
(Contrary to popular belief, power transmission lines and transformers
do not generally contribute as much magnetic field as does internal
wiring.) Other magnetic sources include video displays, motorized clocks
and other equipment, electric blankets and heaters, fluorescent lights
and light dimmers, and the transformers that are inside consumer
devices. Much of the total field strength is from frequencies that are
harmonics or multiples of 50 or 60 Hz (120 Hz, 180 Hz, etc.) and 17,000
Hz of video displays. Cars (especially near the front floorboard of
electronic ignition cars) and motorcycles have fairly strong fields that
are at frequencies higher than 50 Hz. Magnetic field is difficult to
shield, but sheet steel and mu metal are somewhat effective.
2) ELECTRIC FIELD DETECTION
A few areas in most homes read HIGH in
the electric field setting. These include areas near improperly grounded
equipment, the front of video screens, and fluorescent lights. Most of
these fields can be easily shielded using a grounded metal screen or
foil; VDT screens of this type are readily available. You can greatly
reduce the strength of an electric field just by placing your hand in
front of the source. This effect can be seen using a Triple Field meter.
3) MICROWAVE DETECTION
Occasionally, certain areas read HIGH
in the radio/microwave setting. These include door seals around
microwave ovens, and cellular phones (but not regular radio phones,
which are very low-power). Radio/microwaves can be shielded in the same
way as electric fields, although the lower frequency radio waves are not
shielded by your hand as easily as microwaves are. (Metal screens will
shield both.) In the United States, radars and FM transmitters can
legally expose residents to moderately high power levels (as high as 10
mW/cm2 briefly or 0.57 mW/cm2 near cellular
towers), but such exposure is not common.
Price: $200 US To order call us at (905) 827-9448
Simple Ways to Avoid Electromagnetic
Fields
Human
exposure to artificial (AC) electric and magnetic fields has increased
markedly in the past few decades. Obviously, these oscillating fields
and radio waves did not exist on Earth more than a century ago. No
conclusive proof yet exists which shows direct health hazards from these
fields at levels normally encountered, but studies are ongoing.
Electromagnetic (EM) field risks are difficult to study because fields
can exist in many different frequencies and waveforms and can change
rapidly. However, reducing exposure to EM fields can be much easier than
reducing exposure to other common hazards like chemical pollution.
Exposure reduction is accomplished by locating EM field sources and
placing often-used furniture a specified minimum distance away from
those sources. Inside a typical U.S. home, the AC magnetic field
averages about 2 milligauss (somewhat higher in the early evening and
lower in the early morning). Electric fields in the home range up to
about 2 kilovolts per meter.
AC ELECTRIC FIELDS
Electric fields are not very strong in most parts of a house. High
electric-field areas are found near TVs, computer monitors (including
laptop computers), fluorescent lights, light dimmer controls, and
improperly grounded equipment. Field strength drops off rapidly if at
least 3 feet away. Electric fields are high near high-voltage power
lines, but these fields rarely penetrate into the house.
POLARIZATION AND GROUNDING
In
household wiring, the wall outlet usually has a slot for a large prong
and one for a small prong. This type of outlet is said to be
"polarized". The small slot is electrically "hot"; in a typical 115 volt
system it oscillates 60 times a second between about +170 volts and -170
volts, compared to ground. To get a shock, it is necessary to touch this
"hot" slot (or to touch something electrically connected to it), while
also touching something which connects to ground. Things that are
connected to ground include the larger "neutral" slot, the round
"grounding" slot in a 3-prong wall outlet, plumbing pipes, and any metal
which is part of a sink or bathtub.
Be
cautious with old, non-polarized extension cords (with both prongs the
same size). If the cord is plugged in the opposite way that it should
be, several types of appliances may become a shock hazard and will have
high electric field. If an appliance has a polarized plug, use only a
polarized extension cord (with one small and one large prong). The outer
case of any plugged-in appliance is supposed to be connected to ground,
but sometimes it becomes accidentally connected to the electrical "hot"
if the polarized plug is inserted upside down. Because of the
possibility of this improper grounding, you should never touch a
plugged-in appliance while taking a bath, or while touching the metal of
a sink or the water stream in a sink. Also, plug-in appliances should
not be allowed to get wet, because water makes it more likely that the
outer case will become at least weakly connected to electrical "hot".
Besides being a shock hazard, an improperly grounded appliance produces
AC electric fields, which creates currents in your body by proximity,
even if you are not touching the appliance. You can sometimes detect
improper grounding by lightly sliding a fingertip across the surface
using very little pressure. You will usually feel a weak vibration if
the surface is "hot". You can also use an AC voltmeter (connected
between a known ground and the appliance case) or an AC electric field
meter (like the TriField Meter) to determine if the case is hot.
SHIELDING ELECTRIC FIELDS
Shielding strong electrical fields can be done by using any type of
conductive sheet material, such as aluminum window screen,in front of an
indoor appliance. The shield should be connected to electrical ground
for maximum efficiency.
AC MAGNETIC FIELDS
Magnetic fields are much more common in the home than are electric
fields. They don't represent a shock hazard, but, like electric fields,
they produce current in the body. Any wire that carries an AC electrical
current produces magnetic fields. However, two wires are required to
carry power to an appliance, and if the two wires are bundled parallel
and very close together, the magnetic field from one will exactly cancel
the field from the other. Thus, an extension cord rarely produces much
magnetic field.
MAGNETIC FIELD SOURCES
The
main sources of AC magnetic fields in a home are transformers, motorized
equipment, sloppy wiring inside the house walls, excess current carried
by plumbing, and powerlines or underground power cables. Running cars
have a strong AC magnetic field especially nearest the front floorboard,
even though the system is classified as "DC". Commercial aircraft also
have a strong field inside. The fields in cars and aircraft oscillate
faster than the 60 times per second typical of household AC power. Wall
outlets generally produce no magnetic fields. Any piece of electronic
equipment that plugs into the wall, such as a clock radio or answering
machine, will have a transformer.
TRANSFORMERS AND MOTORS
This
transformer either plugs directly into the wall ("AC adapter"), or is
built inside the equipment. The magnetic field is strong up to three
feet from this transformer, whenever the power cord or AC adapter is
plugged in. This field exists even if the appliance is not turned on, or
even if the adapter is not connected. In other words, if an electronic
device uses an AC adapter, to avoid high field you should stay three
feet away from the adapter, but you need not avoid the electronic device
itself. However, if the device has an internal AC adapter and a plain
power cord, stay three feet away from the device itself, whenever the
cord is plugged in. Microwave ovens also have a large transformer built
in, but they emit magnetic field only while cooking. Ordinary
incandescent light bulbs (and electric blankets manufactured since 1992)
produce very little magnetic field. However, high-intensity "halogen"
desk lamps and floor lamps have a large 12-volt transformer built into
their bases and usually produce a strong field up to three feet away.
Fluorescent lights use a smaller transformer and usually have little
magnetic field past three feet so they are not a field source unless the
light is used in close quarters.
Motorized equipment also produces strong magnetic fields. Generally
speaking; the higher the power, the stronger the field. The field is low
when you're at least three feet away from vacuum cleaners, motorized
alarm clocks, and electric can openers; six feet from washing machines
and furnace motors; and 18 inches from electric razors, hairdryers, and
battery-powered motorized equipment.
NON-LOCALIZED MAGNETIC FIELDS
Non-localized magnetic fields are harder to avoid than the limited
fields from appliances. Occasionally a nearby power line will produce
this type of field. More often, it is caused by household plumbing
carrying current. This situation is more likely to occur when the cold
water pipe enters the opposite side of the building from the power line
connection. Safety codes require that the indoor plumbing be connected
to the neutral wire of the power line. This can result in current flow.
A plumber can reduce magnetic field which results from this situation by
installing a "non-conductive coupling" on the cold water pipe just
outside the building.
In
some older homes the hot and neutral power wires are not bundled closely
together, but form a large loop with a gap between them. This creates a
magnetic field that exists only when certain appliances are on, even if
those appliances themselves are low-field. This can usually be corrected
by using an extension cord to change to a different wall outlet, so that
the current is carried through a different part of the in-wall wiring.
Non-localized fields due to household wiring are usually highest in the
room next to where the power line connects or where there is a circuit
breaker box.
DETECTING MAGNETIC FIELDS
A
reliable way to detect the presence of strong fields is by holding a
small magnet. When held lightly, it can be felt to vibrate when held in
a 500 milligauss or higher field. Transformers and motors produce this
much field a few inches away. A TV or computer monitor will start to
jiggle or lose sharpness in a 30 milligauss or higher field, so this can
be a more sensitive indicator of strong fields. A better indicator is a
large coil of wire connected to an AC voltmeter. For the highest degree
of accuracy, use an AC gaussmeter, (like the TriField Meter),
specifically designed to detect and quantify magnetic fields.
SHIELDING MAGNETIC FIELDS
Shielding magnetic fields is more difficult than shielding electric
fields. Sheets of galvanized mild steel work fairly well and are
available in any hardware store. Use a sheet that is thin enough to cut
with scissors, and note that two thin layers shield more than one
thicker layer. Shielding should be placed so it is between you and the
high-field source. Simply staying away from high-field areas is easier
and more convenient.
MICROWAVES AND RADIOWAVES
The
strongest source of microwaves in a home is a microwave oven with a
damaged door seal. You should periodically check the door to make sure
it is not dented and that it latches shut fully parallel to the oven
body. Correctly-functioning microwave ovens emit somewhat less microwave
power. Cellular phones also produce microwaves. ( Regular radio phones
emit a negligible amount of radio power.) Cellphones and other radio
sources sometimes produce interference which can cause sensitive
equipment, such as computers, to malfunction.
SHIELDING AND DETECTING MICROWAVES
Ordinary screen-door aluminum wire mesh (but not the plastic kind) can
shield computers, etc. quite well if the screen is placed between the
radio source and the computer. The screen should be connected to ground.
The more of the computer's area is covered, the better the shielding.
Also, the use of a power-conditioning outlet strip (one which is
specified to reduce "EMI" or electromagnetic interference) is
recommended to avoid radio waves being picked up from the power line by
the computer.
WDDTY
e-News broadcast 18th May 2005
Announcing
a major new report from What Doctors Don't
Tell You
ELECTRO-POLLUTION:
How to keep yourself safe from
electromagnetic
radiation
A damning new 44-page report published by What
Doctors Don't Tell You has found
that we are all being exposed to 500 times more than the safe limit of
electromagnetic radiation, most of which happens in our own homes and
offices, causing a range of conditions from headaches and a flu-like
feeling, to chronic fatigue and depression -
and in extreme cases, leukaemia and tumours.
Occupational studies and anecdotal evidence have revealed that people
are damaged by over-exposure to
electricity in ways that medicine cannot recognise or fix. Many
of us walking around with inexplicable symptoms may simply be suffering
from an overload of the electricity we are assaulted by every moment of
our lives. In a recent
Swedish study from the prestigious Karolinska Institute, it was
estimated that as much as 3 per cent of the population suffer from
extreme adverse reactions to EMFs.
Here's the
harrowing experience of one WDDTY reader, and the dramatic
effect electromagnetic radiation has had on his life:
"My first experience with electrosensitivity was seven years
ago, while working very near a satellite-communications
base station. I worked in that job for
11
months, and had concentration and short-term memory problems for most of
that time. About three years ago,
I installed wireless networking in my home and office. So, for 18
months, I had near-continuous exposure to wireless networking, laptops,
computers, and DECT [digital enhanced cordless telecommunication] and
mobile phones.
"It
was then that both I and my close colleagues noticed a significant
effect on my work capability - poor
concentration/focus, poor short-term
memory, headaches. I also noticed I could tell when the wireless network
was on because of sensation in the skin of my face.
"I
moved house to a semi-rural
location, but my issues with concentration/motivation/ memory still gave
me problems. For example, once a week, I used to have to go to the
Institute of Directors in London for regular weekly meetings. But every
time I went, my symptoms got significantly worse, and those days were a
complete write-off for me. I
discovered they had wireless broadband in the building.
"I
had to resign from my firm."
For decades it has been an open secret that workers
exposed to continual electro-magnetic radiation -
for example, electronics technicians, TV and radio assemblers, welders
and train drivers - run a significantly higher risk of brain tumours and
leukaemia - in some cases, as much as three times the risk.
But it's not just workers
in the electronics and electrical industries who are at risk.
Just six months ago, a
team from Oxford University concluded that children living within 100
metres of overhead power lines had almost twice the risk of developing
leukaemia.
The problem is that we understand how electricity works
better than we understand how we ourselves work. Modern medicine is
still stuck in an obsolete paradigm, believing that the body's
basic signal is a chemical one. Small wonder that doctors, in the main,
refuse to believe that symptoms of electrosensitivity are anything but
the sufferer's paranoid
imaginings.
So what can you do to minimise your exposure to this harmful
radiation and to turn your home into an EMF-free
haven?
This
new 44-page A4 publication pulls together the very latest
research about electropollution and electromagnetic fields and shows you
how to assess your risk and what you can do to minimize your personal
exposure. Major sections
deal with:
-EMFs
at home and at work
-Power
lines
-Mobile
phones
-Phone
masts
-VDUs
-Microwave
ovens
-Geomagnetic
stress from the earth
References and Links:
1.
Draft Reports On EMFs by
California Electric and Magnetic Fields Program of the
California Department of Health Services (CDHS)
at
http://www.applications.dhs.ca.gov/pressreleases/store/PressReleases/46-01.html
2.
Montecito Union School Magnetic Field Survey
(unusually
high EMF levels were not observed that would
explain the leukemia and Lymphoma cancer
cluster) at
http://www.applications.dhs.ca.gov/healthpubfinder/content/ps-deodc/2228.asp
3.
World Health Organization conclusion:
An expert scientific panel convened by the
International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC) has concluded that
residential power frequency electromagnetic
fields (EMFs) are possible human
carcinogens. In doing so, the panel has
agreed with previous evaluations by
committees assembled by the U.S. and the
U.K. governments.
4.
US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) in
1998, a working group of the also classified
EMFs as possible carcinogens, a decision
reaffirmed the following year in NIEHS'
report to the U.S. Congress. In 2001, an
advisory group to U.K. government, chaired
by Sir Richard Doll, also pointed to
a possible leukemia risk among children.
Over 10 years ago, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency reached a similar
conclusion -- that report was never
officially completed and published, however,
due to intense political pressure from
electrical utilities and the military. The
June 2001 press release states, "IARC has
now concluded that ELF magnetic fields are
possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on
consistent statistical associations of high
level residential magnetic fields with a
doubling of risk of childhood leukaemia.
Children who are exposed to residential ELF
magnetic fields less than 0.4 microTesla (4
milliGauss) have no increased risk for
leukaemia." The conclusion is based on the
"pooled analyses of data from a number of
well-conducted studies".
-
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation In the Canadian perspective, this finding is pertinent
as a 1995 electromagnetic survey of
Canadian homes found that bedroom
corners have the highest fields in
Canadian homes: 6mG in the master
bedroom, and 7.5mG in childrens'
bedrooms. The survey finding suggests
that many Canadian children are at
serious official risk due to home wiring
conditions - most of which can be easily
corrected at low cost.
-
Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity:
Biological Effects of Dirty Electricity
with Emphasis on Diabetes and Multiple
Sclerosis, Printed on Electromagnetic
Biology and Medicine, 25: 259-268,
2006. ISSN 1536-8378 Written By
MAGDA HAVAS, Environmental and Resource
Studies, Trent University, Peterborough,
Ontario, Canada
- Blank, M., Goodman, R. (2004).
Comment: a biological guide for
electromagnetic safety: the stress
response. Bioelectromagnetics
25(8):642-646.
- Bylinsky, G. (1999). Hot new
technologies for American factories.
Fortune Mag. July 5, 1999, p. 4.
- Firstenberg, A. (2001). No Place
to Hide. Volume 3 (1): April 2001.
Special Issue on Russian and Ukrainian
Research, Cellular Phone Taskforce,
Mendocino, CA.
- Graham, M. (2000). A ubiquitous
pollutant. Memorandum No. UCB/ERL
M00/55. 28 October 2000, Electronics
Research Laboratory, College of
Engineering, University of California,
Berkeley.
- Graham, M. (2002). Mitigation of
electrical pollution in the home.
Memorandum No.
- UCB/ERL M02/18. 19 April
2002, Electronics Research Laboratory,
College of
- Engineering, University of
California, Berkeley.
- Graham, M. (2003). A microsurge
meter for electrical pollution research.
Memorandum No. UCB/ERL M03/3, 19
February 2003, Electronics Research
Laboratory, College of Engineering,
University of California, Berkeley.
- Havas, M., Stetzer, D. (2004). Dirty
electricity and electrical
hypersensitivity: five case studies.
World Health Organization Workshop on
Electrical Hypersensitivity 25-26
- October 2004, Prague, Czech
Republic.
- Havas, M., Illiatovitch, M.,
Proctor, C. (2004). Teacher and student
response to the removal
- of dirty electricity by the Graham/Stetzer
filter at Willow Wood School in Toronto,
Canada. Presented at the 3rd
International Workshop on the Biological
Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, 4-8
October 2004, Kos, Greece.
- Hinkle, L. E., Wolf, S. (1950).
Studies in diabetes mellitus: changes in
glucose, ketone and water metabolism
during stress. Life Stress and Bodily
Disease. Baltimore, MD: Williams and
Wilkins.
- IEEE 519-1992. (1992). Recommended
Practices and Requirements for Harmonic
Control in Electrical Power Systems.
Sponsors: Transmission and Distribution
Committee of the IEEE Power Engineering
Society and Static Power Converter
Committee of the IEEE Industry
Applications Society, Approved June 18,
1992 IEEE Standards Board, Approved
January 4, 1993 American National
Standards Institute.
- Kazakhstan Health Department.
(2003). Permissible levels of
high-frequency electromagnetic
pollutions voltage in wires of
industrial frequency alternating
current. Confirmed: The Order of the Head
State Sanitary Physician of the Republic
of Kazakhstan. November 28, 2003, No.
69.
- Li, L., Dai, Y., Xia, R., Chen, S.,
Qiao, D. (2005). Pulsed electric field
exposure of insulin induces
anti-proliferative effects on human
hepatocytes. Bioelectromagnetics
26(8): 639-647.
- Philips, A., Philips, J. (2006).
The Power Watch Handbook. London:
Piatkus Books Ltd., 294 pp.
- Sakurai, T., Satake, A., Sumi, S.,
Inoue, K., Miyakoshi, J. (2004). An
extremely low frequency magnetic field
attenuates insulin secretion from the
insulinoma cell line, RIN-m.
Bioelectromagnetics 25:160-166.
- Sbraggia, C. (2002). Letter from
school nurse.
www.electricalpollution.com.
- Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A.,
Sicree, R., King, H. (2004). Global
prevalence of diabetes.
- Diabetes Care 27:1047-1053.
Articles:
Health
Advisories
School
Reports
Health
Risks and Benefits
Other
Articles
In the
News
Research From the Stetzer Website:
The Possible Role of Contact Current in
Cancer Risk Associated With Residential
Magnetic Fields” by R. Kavet, L. E.
Zaffanella, J. P. Daigle, and K. L. Ebi,
published in “Bioelectromagnetics
21:538-553 (2000). “Residential
electrical wiring safety practices in
the US result in the possibility of a
small voltage (up to a few tenths of a
volt) on appliance surfaces with respect
to water pipes or other grounded
surfaces. This “open circuit voltage”
(Voc) will cause “contact current” to
flow in a person who touches the
appliance and completes an electrical
circuit to ground. This paper presents
data suggesting that contact current due
to Voc is an exposure that may explain
the reported associations of residential
magnetic fields with childhood
leukemia.”EMF proliferated the growth
of cancer cells at
http://www.emfpollution.com/emf-proliferated-the-growth-of-cancer-cells
EMF
Protection
Guides
-
Silencing
the Fields
- EMF
Reduction
Principles -
is a
practical
guide to
reduction of
AC magnetic
fields, by
Ed Leeper.
Includes
commentary
on EMF
health
effects
studies.
Research
Information
Sites
-
The EMF-Link
® is a huge
database
provides
substantive
information
on
biological
and health
effects of
electric and
magnetic
fields (EMFs)
from common
sources such
as power
lines,
electrical
wiring,
appliances,
medical
equipment,
communications
facilities,
cellular
phones, and
computers
EMF Link is
a service of
Information
Ventures,
Ltd.
-
Electric and
Magnetic
Fields (EMF)
Analysis and
views
from the
Edison
Electric
Institute.
This
electrical
utility
trade
association
finds no
evidence
that the use
of
electricity
poses a
major
unrecognized
public
health
danger.
-
The
Bristol's
University
Human
Radiation
Effects
group -
The site is
discussing
research in
electromagnetic
fields,
including
work on the
attachment
of corona
ions from
powerlines
to pollutant
aerosols and
how
inhalation
of these
particles
affects
human
health. News
also appear
in the main
bris.co.uk
site -
http://www.bris.ac.uk/news/2004/376
-
Research
Center for
Bioelectromagnetic
Interaction
- A
department
of the
Aachen
University
Hospital (RWTH
Aachen) for
interdisciplinary
research on
biomedical
effects of
electromagnetic
fields, and
provides
Germany's
largest
database on
EMF-related
literature.
-
Sci.med.physics
FAQs -
Topics
include
powerlines
and cancer,
cell phone
antennas and
health, and
health
effects of
EM fields.
Other Sites of Interest
- Microwave News - reporting on the effects of EMF.
- Bridlewood EMF Info - A comprehensive website on EMF.
- EMR (Electromagnetic Radiation) Network - A new national grassroots organization to voice concerns about public exposures to electromagnetic radiation. The group works on issues related to: RF/MW (Radio Frequency/Microwave) radiation issues, public health issues related to cell phones, towers, radio, TV, radar and power lines.
- EMG Interface - Jim Beal, ex-NASA research engineer and member of the U.S. Science Advisory Committee in Virginia, and EMF consultant presents a current look at his life's work in studying EMF effects on the human body. Source of 1998 Bioelectromagnetic Health Effects Update as 113 page book covering: 1. Human Sensitivities To Electrical Fields (EFs) & Electromagnetic Fields(EMFs); 2. Stress, Health Issues (Primarily For Women) , & Potential Therapies; 3. Cellular/Mobile Phones Health Issues.
- Field Management Services Corp. - An extensive site on engineering solutions to reducing EMF. A particular emphais on how to reduce EMF to avoid problems with electronic equipment. Basic methods to reduce EMF are: Increase the distance from the source; reduce the source strength; shield the field source or affected area. Several technical papers and source of technical consulting.
- Bioshield Home Page. An interesting site that discusses EMF effects from Video Display Terminals (VDTs).
- bioelectromagnetics.org: The Bioelectromagnetics Society promotes scientific study of the interaction of electromagnetic energy and acoustic energy with biological systems.
- biorelais.com
- enertech.net: Specializes in applied research, scientific consulting, and the development of hardware and software to evaluate power frequency magnetic fields.
- EmfProtection.com:
- eco-electrics.com: Provides services regarding electromagnetic pollution from power lines, faulty grounding, RF radiation, positioning of transformer stations, as well as any EMF problems.
- microwavesafe.net: Microwave Safe Australia - is the leader in Microwave Radiation Surveillance in Australia
EMF
Consultants
Biophysica Inc
To order your copy of this report for just £12-95
inclusive of post and packing (Overseas £14-15), click here
http://www.wddty.co.uk
Price of Triple Field meter: $200 US To order call us at (905) 827-9448
|