Electromagnetic Fields

Triple Field Meter:  Three Fields Detected  1) AC gaussmeter, 2)  Electric field meter, 3)  RF field strength meter combined in one electromagnetic instrument.

This Triple Field Meter is the only one which combines magnetic, electric, and radio/microwave detectors in one package, so that the entire nonionizing electromagnetic spectrum is covered.  In addition, the magnetic setting and the electric setting measure true magnitude, a feature found elsewhere only in more expensive meters.

The Triple Field Meter Meter and can be used to determine whether an AC line is hot or neutral, even through a wall. It can easily detect by proximity which side of a wall outlet or which wire of an extension cord is hot. It can also detect improper grounding, as well as the extensive electric fields from video monitors and fluorescent lights.

1)  MAGNETIC FIELD DETECTION

In most homes or offices, some areas are "hot" spots with readings in the HIGH range. Most often, this is caused by magnetic fields, which come largely from unpaired internal wiring. (Contrary to popular belief, power transmission lines and transformers do not generally contribute as much magnetic field as does internal wiring.) Other magnetic sources include video displays, motorized clocks and other equipment, electric blankets and heaters, fluorescent lights and light dimmers, and the transformers that are inside consumer devices. Much of the total field strength is from frequencies that are harmonics or multiples of 50 or 60 Hz (120 Hz, 180 Hz, etc.) and 17,000 Hz of video displays. Cars (especially near the front floorboard of electronic ignition cars) and motorcycles have fairly strong fields that are at frequencies higher than 50 Hz. Magnetic field is difficult to shield, but sheet steel and mu metal are somewhat effective.

2)  ELECTRIC FIELD DETECTION

A few areas in most homes read HIGH in the electric field setting. These include areas near improperly grounded equipment, the front of video screens, and fluorescent lights. Most of these fields can be easily shielded using a grounded metal screen or foil; VDT screens of this type are readily available. You can greatly reduce the strength of an electric field just by placing your hand in front of the source. This effect can be seen using a Triple Field meter.

3)  MICROWAVE DETECTION

Occasionally, certain areas read HIGH in the radio/microwave setting. These include door seals around microwave ovens, and cellular phones (but not regular radio phones, which are very low-power). Radio/microwaves can be shielded in the same way as electric fields, although the lower frequency radio waves are not shielded by your hand as easily as microwaves are. (Metal screens will shield both.) In the United States, radars and FM transmitters can legally expose residents to moderately high power levels (as high as 10 mW/cm2 briefly or 0.57 mW/cm2 near cellular towers), but such exposure is not common.

Price:  $200 US   To order call us at (905) 827-9448

 

Simple Ways to Avoid Electromagnetic Fields

Human exposure to artificial (AC) electric and magnetic fields has increased markedly in the past few decades. Obviously, these oscillating fields and radio waves did not exist on Earth more than a century ago. No conclusive proof yet exists which shows direct health hazards from these fields at levels normally encountered, but studies are ongoing.

Electromagnetic (EM) field risks are difficult to study because fields can exist in many different frequencies and waveforms and can change rapidly. However, reducing exposure to EM fields can be much easier than reducing exposure to other common hazards like chemical pollution. Exposure reduction is accomplished by locating EM field sources and placing often-used furniture a specified minimum distance away from those sources. Inside a typical U.S. home, the AC magnetic field averages about 2 milligauss (somewhat higher in the early evening and lower in the early morning). Electric fields in the home range up to about 2 kilovolts per meter.

AC ELECTRIC FIELDS

Electric fields are not very strong in most parts of a house. High electric-field areas are found near TVs, computer monitors (including laptop computers), fluorescent lights, light dimmer controls, and improperly grounded equipment. Field strength drops off rapidly if at least 3 feet away. Electric fields are high near high-voltage power lines, but these fields rarely penetrate into the house.

POLARIZATION AND GROUNDING

In household wiring, the wall outlet usually has a slot for a large prong and one for a small prong. This type of outlet is said to be "polarized". The small slot is electrically "hot"; in a typical 115 volt system it oscillates 60 times a second between about +170 volts and -170 volts, compared to ground. To get a shock, it is necessary to touch this "hot" slot (or to touch something electrically connected to it), while also touching something which connects to ground. Things that are connected to ground include the larger "neutral" slot, the round "grounding" slot in a 3-prong wall outlet, plumbing pipes, and any metal which is part of a sink or bathtub.

Be cautious with old, non-polarized extension cords (with both prongs the same size). If the cord is plugged in the opposite way that it should be, several types of appliances may become a shock hazard and will have high electric field. If an appliance has a polarized plug, use only a polarized extension cord (with one small and one large prong). The outer case of any plugged-in appliance is supposed to be connected to ground, but sometimes it becomes accidentally connected to the electrical "hot" if the polarized plug is inserted upside down. Because of the possibility of this improper grounding, you should never touch a plugged-in appliance while taking a bath, or while touching the metal of a sink or the water stream in a sink. Also, plug-in appliances should not be allowed to get wet, because water makes it more likely that the outer case will become at least weakly connected to electrical "hot".

Besides being a shock hazard, an improperly grounded appliance produces AC electric fields, which creates currents in your body by proximity, even if you are not touching the appliance. You can sometimes detect improper grounding by lightly sliding a fingertip across the surface using very little pressure. You will usually feel a weak vibration if the surface is "hot". You can also use an AC voltmeter (connected between a known ground and the appliance case) or an AC electric field meter (like the TriField Meter) to determine if the case is hot.

SHIELDING ELECTRIC FIELDS

Shielding strong electrical fields can be done by using any type of conductive sheet material, such as aluminum window screen,in front of an indoor appliance. The shield should be connected to electrical ground for maximum efficiency.

AC MAGNETIC FIELDS

Magnetic fields are much more common in the home than are electric fields. They don't represent a shock hazard, but, like electric fields, they produce current in the body. Any wire that carries an AC electrical current produces magnetic fields. However, two wires are required to carry power to an appliance, and if the two wires are bundled parallel and very close together, the magnetic field from one will exactly cancel the field from the other. Thus, an extension cord rarely produces much magnetic field.

MAGNETIC FIELD SOURCES

The main sources of AC magnetic fields in a home are transformers, motorized equipment, sloppy wiring inside the house walls, excess current carried by plumbing, and powerlines or underground power cables. Running cars have a strong AC magnetic field especially nearest the front floorboard, even though the system is classified as "DC". Commercial aircraft also have a strong field inside. The fields in cars and aircraft oscillate faster than the 60 times per second typical of household AC power. Wall outlets generally produce no magnetic fields. Any piece of electronic equipment that plugs into the wall, such as a clock radio or answering machine, will have a transformer.

TRANSFORMERS AND MOTORS

This transformer either plugs directly into the wall ("AC adapter"), or is built inside the equipment. The magnetic field is strong up to three feet from this transformer, whenever the power cord or AC adapter is plugged in. This field exists even if the appliance is not turned on, or even if the adapter is not connected. In other words, if an electronic device uses an AC adapter, to avoid high field you should stay three feet away from the adapter, but you need not avoid the electronic device itself. However, if the device has an internal AC adapter and a plain power cord, stay three feet away from the device itself, whenever the cord is plugged in. Microwave ovens also have a large transformer built in, but they emit magnetic field only while cooking. Ordinary incandescent light bulbs (and electric blankets manufactured since 1992) produce very little magnetic field. However, high-intensity "halogen" desk lamps and floor lamps have a large 12-volt transformer built into their bases and usually produce a strong field up to three feet away. Fluorescent lights use a smaller transformer and usually have little magnetic field past three feet so they are not a field source unless the light is used in close quarters.

Motorized equipment also produces strong magnetic fields. Generally speaking; the higher the power, the stronger the field. The field is low when you're at least three feet away from vacuum cleaners, motorized alarm clocks, and electric can openers; six feet from washing machines and furnace motors; and 18 inches from electric razors, hairdryers, and battery-powered motorized equipment.

NON-LOCALIZED MAGNETIC FIELDS

Non-localized magnetic fields are harder to avoid than the limited fields from appliances. Occasionally a nearby power line will produce this type of field. More often, it is caused by household plumbing carrying current. This situation is more likely to occur when the cold water pipe enters the opposite side of the building from the power line connection. Safety codes require that the indoor plumbing be connected to the neutral wire of the power line. This can result in current flow. A plumber can reduce magnetic field which results from this situation by installing a "non-conductive coupling" on the cold water pipe just outside the building.

In some older homes the hot and neutral power wires are not bundled closely together, but form a large loop with a gap between them. This creates a magnetic field that exists only when certain appliances are on, even if those appliances themselves are low-field. This can usually be corrected by using an extension cord to change to a different wall outlet, so that the current is carried through a different part of the in-wall wiring. Non-localized fields due to household wiring are usually highest in the room next to where the power line connects or where there is a circuit breaker box.

DETECTING MAGNETIC FIELDS

A reliable way to detect the presence of strong fields is by holding a small magnet. When held lightly, it can be felt to vibrate when held in a 500 milligauss or higher field. Transformers and motors produce this much field a few inches away. A TV or computer monitor will start to jiggle or lose sharpness in a 30 milligauss or higher field, so this can be a more sensitive indicator of strong fields. A better indicator is a large coil of wire connected to an AC voltmeter. For the highest degree of accuracy, use an AC gaussmeter, (like the TriField Meter), specifically designed to detect and quantify magnetic fields.

SHIELDING MAGNETIC FIELDS

Shielding magnetic fields is more difficult than shielding electric fields. Sheets of galvanized mild steel work fairly well and are available in any hardware store. Use a sheet that is thin enough to cut with scissors, and note that two thin layers shield more than one thicker layer. Shielding should be placed so it is between you and the high-field source. Simply staying away from high-field areas is easier and more convenient.

MICROWAVES AND RADIOWAVES

The strongest source of microwaves in a home is a microwave oven with a damaged door seal. You should periodically check the door to make sure it is not dented and that it latches shut fully parallel to the oven body. Correctly-functioning microwave ovens emit somewhat less microwave power. Cellular phones also produce microwaves. ( Regular radio phones emit a negligible amount of radio power.) Cellphones and other radio sources sometimes produce interference which can cause sensitive equipment, such as computers, to malfunction.

SHIELDING AND DETECTING MICROWAVES

Ordinary screen-door aluminum wire mesh (but not the plastic kind) can shield computers, etc. quite well if the screen is placed between the radio source and the computer. The screen should be connected to ground. The more of the computer's area is covered, the better the shielding. Also, the use of a power-conditioning outlet strip (one which is specified to reduce "EMI" or electromagnetic interference) is recommended to avoid radio waves being picked up from the power line by the computer.

WDDTY e-News  broadcast 18th May 2005


Announcing a major new report from What Doctors Don't Tell You


ELECTRO-POLLUTION:  How to keep yourself safe from electromagnetic radiation



A damning new 44-page report published by What Doctors Don't Tell You has found that we are all being exposed to 500 times more than the safe limit of electromagnetic radiation, most of which happens in our own homes and offices, causing a range of conditions from headaches and a flu-like feeling, to chronic fatigue and depression - and in extreme cases, leukaemia and tumours.

Occupational studies and anecdotal evidence have revealed that people are damaged by over-exposure to electricity in ways that medicine cannot recognise or fix.
Many of us walking around with inexplicable symptoms may simply be suffering from an overload of the electricity we are assaulted by every moment of our lives.  In a recent Swedish study from the prestigious Karolinska Institute, it was estimated that as much as 3 per cent of the population suffer from extreme adverse reactions to EMFs.

Here's the harrowing experience of one WDDTY reader, and the dramatic effect electromagnetic radiation has had on his life:

            "
My first experience with electrosensitivity was seven years ago, while working very near a satellite-communications base station. I worked in that job for

11 months, and had concentration and short-term memory problems for most of that time. About three years ago, I installed wireless networking in my home and office. So, for 18 months, I had near-continuous exposure to wireless networking, laptops, computers, and DECT [digital enhanced cordless telecommunication] and mobile phones.

          "It was then that both I and my close colleagues noticed a significant effect on my work capability - poor concentration/focus, poor short-term memory, headaches. I also noticed I could tell when the wireless network was on because of sensation in the skin of my face.

          "I moved house to a semi-rural location, but my issues with concentration/motivation/ memory still gave me problems. For example, once a week, I used to have to go to the Institute of Directors in London for regular weekly meetings. But every time I went, my symptoms got significantly worse, and those days were a complete write-off for me. I discovered they had wireless broadband in the building. 

          "I had to resign from my firm."


For decades it has been an open secret that workers exposed to continual electro-magnetic radiation - for example, electronics technicians, TV and radio assemblers, welders and train drivers - run a significantly higher risk of brain tumours and leukaemia - in some cases, as much as three times the risk.  But it's not just workers in the electronics and electrical industries who are at risk.  Just six months ago, a team from Oxford University concluded that children living within 100 metres of overhead power lines had almost twice the risk of developing leukaemia.

The problem is that we understand how electricity works better than we understand how we ourselves work. Modern medicine is still stuck in an obsolete paradigm, believing that the body's basic signal is a chemical one. Small wonder that doctors, in the main, refuse to believe that symptoms of electrosensitivity are anything but the sufferer's paranoid imaginings.

So what can you do to minimise your exposure to this harmful radiation and to turn your home into an EMF-free haven?
 

This new 44-page A4 publication pulls together the very latest research about electropollution and electromagnetic fields and shows you how to assess your risk and what you can do to minimize your personal exposure.  Major sections deal with:

     -EMFs at home and at work 
     -Power lines 
     -Mobile phones 
     -Phone masts
     -VDUs
     -Microwave ovens
     -Geomagnetic stress from the earth

 

References and Links:

1.      Draft Reports On EMFs by California Electric and Magnetic Fields Program of the California Department of Health Services (CDHS) at http://www.applications.dhs.ca.gov/pressreleases/store/PressReleases/46-01.html

2.       Montecito Union School Magnetic Field Survey (unusually high EMF levels were not observed that would explain the leukemia and Lymphoma cancer cluster) at http://www.applications.dhs.ca.gov/healthpubfinder/content/ps-deodc/2228.asp

3.       World Health Organization conclusion:   An expert scientific panel convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has concluded that residential power frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are possible human carcinogens. In doing so, the panel has agreed with previous evaluations by committees assembled by the U.S. and the U.K. governments. 

4.       US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) in 1998, a working group of the also classified EMFs as possible carcinogens, a decision reaffirmed the following year in NIEHS' report to the U.S. Congress. In 2001, an advisory group to U.K. government, chaired by Sir Richard Doll, also pointed to a possible leukemia risk among children. Over 10 years ago, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reached a similar conclusion -- that report was never officially completed and published, however, due to intense political pressure from electrical utilities and the military.   The June 2001 press release states, "IARC has now concluded that ELF magnetic fields are possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on consistent statistical associations of high level residential magnetic fields with a doubling of risk of childhood leukaemia. Children who are exposed to residential ELF magnetic fields less than 0.4 microTesla (4 milliGauss) have no increased risk for leukaemia." The conclusion is based on the "pooled analyses of data from a number of well-conducted studies". 

  1. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation In the Canadian perspective, this finding is pertinent as a 1995 electromagnetic survey of Canadian homes found that bedroom corners have the highest fields in Canadian homes: 6mG in the master bedroom, and 7.5mG in childrens' bedrooms. The survey finding suggests that many Canadian children are at serious official risk due to home wiring conditions - most of which can be easily corrected at low cost.
  2. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Biological Effects of Dirty Electricity with Emphasis on Diabetes and Multiple Sclerosis, Printed on Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 25: 259-268, 2006. ISSN 1536-8378  Written By MAGDA HAVAS, Environmental and Resource Studies, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
 
  1. Blank, M., Goodman, R. (2004). Comment: a biological guide for electromagnetic safety: the stress response. Bioelectromagnetics 25(8):642-646.
  2. Bylinsky, G. (1999). Hot new technologies for American factories. Fortune Mag. July 5, 1999, p. 4.
  3. Firstenberg, A. (2001). No Place to Hide. Volume 3 (1): April 2001. Special Issue on Russian and Ukrainian Research, Cellular Phone Taskforce, Mendocino, CA.
  4. Graham, M. (2000). A ubiquitous pollutant. Memorandum No. UCB/ERL M00/55. 28 October 2000, Electronics Research Laboratory, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  5. Graham, M. (2002). Mitigation of electrical pollution in the home. Memorandum No.
  6. UCB/ERL M02/18. 19 April 2002, Electronics Research Laboratory, College of
  7. Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  8. Graham, M. (2003). A microsurge meter for electrical pollution research. Memorandum No. UCB/ERL M03/3, 19 February 2003, Electronics Research Laboratory, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  9. Havas, M., Stetzer, D. (2004). Dirty electricity and electrical hypersensitivity: five case studies. World Health Organization Workshop on Electrical Hypersensitivity 25-26
  10. October 2004, Prague, Czech Republic.
  11. Havas, M., Illiatovitch, M., Proctor, C. (2004). Teacher and student response to the removal
  12. of dirty electricity by the Graham/Stetzer filter at Willow Wood School in Toronto, Canada. Presented at the 3rd International Workshop on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, 4-8 October 2004, Kos, Greece.
  13. Hinkle, L. E., Wolf, S. (1950). Studies in diabetes mellitus: changes in glucose, ketone and water metabolism during stress. Life Stress and Bodily Disease. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
  14. IEEE 519-1992. (1992). Recommended Practices and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electrical Power Systems. Sponsors: Transmission and Distribution Committee of the IEEE Power Engineering Society and Static Power Converter Committee of the IEEE Industry Applications Society, Approved June 18, 1992 IEEE Standards Board, Approved January 4, 1993 American National Standards Institute.
  15. Kazakhstan Health Department. (2003). Permissible levels of high-frequency electromagnetic pollutions voltage in wires of industrial frequency alternating current. Confirmed: The Order of the Head State Sanitary Physician of the Republic of Kazakhstan. November 28, 2003, No. 69.
  16. Li, L., Dai, Y., Xia, R., Chen, S., Qiao, D. (2005). Pulsed electric field exposure of insulin induces anti-proliferative effects on human hepatocytes. Bioelectromagnetics 26(8): 639-647.
  17. Philips, A., Philips, J. (2006). The Power Watch Handbook. London: Piatkus Books Ltd., 294 pp.
  18. Sakurai, T., Satake, A., Sumi, S., Inoue, K., Miyakoshi, J. (2004). An extremely low frequency magnetic field attenuates insulin secretion from the insulinoma cell line, RIN-m. Bioelectromagnetics 25:160-166.
  19. Sbraggia, C. (2002). Letter from school nurse. www.electricalpollution.com.
  20. Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., King, H. (2004). Global prevalence of diabetes.
  21. Diabetes Care 27:1047-1053.

Articles:

Health Advisories

School Reports

Health Risks and Benefits

Other Articles

In the News

Research From the Stetzer Website:

The Possible Role of Contact Current in Cancer Risk Associated With Residential Magnetic Fields” by R. Kavet, L. E. Zaffanella, J. P. Daigle, and K. L. Ebi, published in “Bioelectromagnetics 21:538-553 (2000). “Residential electrical wiring safety practices in the US result in the possibility of a small voltage (up to a few tenths of a volt) on appliance surfaces with respect to water pipes or other grounded surfaces.  This “open circuit voltage” (Voc) will cause “contact current” to flow in a person who touches the appliance and completes an electrical circuit to ground.  This paper presents data suggesting that contact current due to Voc is an exposure that may explain the reported associations of residential magnetic fields with childhood leukemia.”

EMF proliferated the growth of cancer cells at http://www.emfpollution.com/emf-proliferated-the-growth-of-cancer-cells

 

EMF Protection Guides

  • Silencing the Fields - EMF Reduction Principles - is a practical guide to reduction of AC magnetic fields, by Ed Leeper. Includes commentary on EMF health effects studies.

 Research Information Sites

  • The EMF-Link ® is a huge database provides substantive information on biological and health effects of electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) from common sources such as power lines, electrical wiring, appliances, medical equipment, communications facilities, cellular phones, and computers EMF Link is a service of Information Ventures, Ltd.
  • Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMF) Analysis and views from the Edison Electric Institute. This electrical utility trade association finds no evidence that the use of electricity poses a major unrecognized public health danger.
  • The Bristol's University Human Radiation Effects group - The site is discussing research in electromagnetic fields, including work on the attachment of corona ions from powerlines to pollutant aerosols and how inhalation of these particles affects human health. News also appear in the main bris.co.uk site - http://www.bris.ac.uk/news/2004/376
  • Research Center for Bioelectromagnetic Interaction - A department of the Aachen University Hospital (RWTH Aachen) for interdisciplinary research on biomedical effects of electromagnetic fields, and provides Germany's largest database on EMF-related literature.
  • Sci.med.physics FAQs - Topics include powerlines and cancer, cell phone antennas and health, and health effects of EM fields.
     

Other Sites of Interest

  • Microwave News - reporting on the effects of EMF.
  • Bridlewood EMF Info - A comprehensive website on EMF.
  • EMR (Electromagnetic Radiation) Network - A new national grassroots organization to voice concerns about public exposures to electromagnetic radiation.  The group works on issues related to: RF/MW (Radio Frequency/Microwave) radiation issues, public health issues related to cell phones, towers, radio, TV, radar and power lines.
  • EMG Interface - Jim Beal, ex-NASA research engineer and member of the U.S. Science Advisory Committee in Virginia, and EMF consultant presents a current look at his life's work in studying EMF effects on the human body.  Source of 1998 Bioelectromagnetic Health Effects Update as 113 page  book covering: 1. Human Sensitivities To Electrical Fields (EFs) & Electromagnetic Fields(EMFs); 2. Stress, Health Issues (Primarily For Women) , & Potential Therapies; 3. Cellular/Mobile Phones Health Issues.
  • Field Management Services Corp. - An extensive site on engineering solutions to reducing EMF.  A particular emphais on how to reduce EMF to avoid problems with electronic equipment.  Basic methods to reduce EMF are: Increase the distance from the source;  reduce the source strength;  shield the field source or affected area.  Several technical papers and  source of technical consulting.
  • Bioshield Home Page.  An interesting site that discusses EMF effects from Video Display Terminals (VDTs).
  • bioelectromagnetics.org:    The Bioelectromagnetics Society promotes scientific study of the interaction of electromagnetic energy and acoustic energy with biological systems.
  • biorelais.com    
  • enertech.net:    Specializes in applied research, scientific consulting, and the development of hardware and software to evaluate power frequency magnetic fields.
  • EmfProtection.com:        
  • eco-electrics.com: Provides services regarding electromagnetic pollution from power lines, faulty grounding, RF radiation, positioning of transformer stations, as well as any EMF problems.
  • microwavesafe.net: Microwave Safe Australia - is the leader in Microwave Radiation Surveillance in Australia

EMF Consultants

Biophysica Inc

To order your copy of this report for just £12-95 inclusive of post and packing (Overseas £14-15), click here http://www.wddty.co.uk

Price of Triple Field meter:  $200 US   To order call us at (905) 827-9448

This page last updated January 29, 2008

E-mail: info at biophysica dot com

or phone (905) 827-9448

Back to Home Page